|
A Character Of The Sieks
(From the observations of Colonel Polier
and Mr. George Forster)
The Sieks are in general strong and well made; accustomed
from their infancy to the most laborious life and hardest fare,
they make marches and undergo fatigue that really appear astonishing.
In their excursions they carry no tents or luggage, except perhaps
a small tent for the principal officer; the rest shelter themselves
under blankets which serve them also in cold weather to wrap themselves
in, and which, on a march, cover their saddles. They have commonly
two, some of them three, horses each, of the middle size, strong,
active and mild tempered. The provinces of Lahore and Moultan, noted
for a breed of the best horses in Hindustan, afford them an ample
supply; and indeed they take great care to increase it by all means
in their power. Though they make merry on the demise of any of their
brethren.1 they mourn for the death
of a horse, thus showing their love of an animal so necessary to
them in their professional capacity. The food of the Sieks is of
the coarsest kind, and such as the poorest people in Hindustan use
from necessity. Bread baked in ashes, and soaked in a mash made
of different sorts of pulse, is the best dish, and such as they
never indulge in but when at full leisure; otherwise vetches and
tares, hastily parched, is all they care for. They abhor smoking
tobacco, for what reasons I cannot discover, but intoxicate themselves
freely with spirits of their own country manufacture: a cup of the
last they never fail taking after a fatigue at night. Their dress
is extremely scanty; a pair of long blue drawers,2
and a kind of chequered plaid, a part of which is fastened round
the waist, and the other thrown over the shoulder, with a mean turban,
form their clothing and equipage. The chiefs are distinguished by
wearing some heavy gold bracelets3
on their wrists and sometimes a chain
|
FOOTNOTE
|
|
1
|
The Sikhs do not make
merry on the occasion of the death of a Sikh but they accept
it as the Will of God and recite hymns from their scripture,
the Guru Granth Sahib, in resignation to it. 'Having been sent
by him they come (into the world) and recalled by Him they go
back', says Guru Nanak. 'it is the right and privilege of the
brave to die, if they die in an approved cause,' says he. |
|
2
|
Called kachha or kachhehra
kachahira |
|
3
|
Called Kada worn on festive
occasions in many parts of the Panjab up to the beginning of
the twentieth century. |
|
4
|
Eating of pork or any
other kind of meat is not particularly encouraged amongst the
Sikhs, much less considered an essential part of the Sikh diet.
The use of bhang prevalent amongst the majority of Nihang Sikhs
is positively looked down upon as undesirable. |
|
5
|
Ahmad Shah Abdali or
Durrani. |
|
6
|
Light cavalry. |
of the same metal round their turbans, and by being mounted on better
horses; otherwise no distinction appears amongst them. The chiefs
are numerous, some of whom have the command of ten or twelve thousand
cavalry; but this power is confined to a small number, the inferior
officers maintaining from one to two thousand, and many not more than
twenty or thirty horses, a certain quota of which is furnished by
the chiefs, the greater part being the individual property of the
horseman.
From the spirit of independence so invariably infused amongst them
their mutual jealousy and rapacious roving temper, the Sieks at
this day are seldom seen co-operating in national concert; but actuated
by the influence of an individual ambition or private distrust,
they pursue such plans only as coincide with these motives. An example
of their forces being engaged in opposite interests has been noticed
in the case of Maha Singh, who succoured the Rajah of Jumbo against
the Siek party who had invaded his country. Before the chiefs of
the mountaineers' country at the head of the Panjab were reduced
to a tributary state, severe depredations were committed on them
by the Sieks who plundered and destroyed their habitations, carried
off the cattle, and, if strong and well formed, the male children,
who were made converts to the faith of Nanock. But since the payment
of a fixed tribute has been stipulated, which does not amount to
more than five per cent of the revenue, the mountaineers are little
molested, except when the Sieks have been called upon to adjust
their domestic quarrels.
The extensive and fertile territories of the Sieks, and their attachment
and application, in the midst of warfare, to the occupations of
agriculture, must evidently produce a large revenue. The district
dependent on Lahore, in the reign of Aurangzeb, produced, according
to Mr. Bernier, a revenue of two hundred forty-six lacks and ninety-five
thousand rupees; and we are naturally led to suppose, from the industrious
skill of the Sieks in the various branches of cultivation, that
no great decrease of that amount can have taken place since the
Panjab has fallen into their possession.
An extensive and valuable commerce is also maintained in their
country, which has been extended to distant quarters of India, particularly
to the provinces of Bengal and Behar, where many Siek merchants
of opulence at this time reside. The Omichand, who took so active,
though unfortunate, a share in the revolution which the English
effected in Bengal, was a Siek, as is his adopted son, who is now
an inhabitant of Calcutta. Merchants of every nation or sect, who
may introduce a traffic into their territories, or are established
under their government, experience a full protection and enjoy commercial
privileges in common with their own subjects. All the same, it must
be noticed that such immunities are granted only to those who remain
amongst them or import wares for the immediate supply of the Siek
markets. But the foreign traders, even travellers who attempt to
pass through the Panjab, are often plundered and usually ill-treated;4
in the event of no molestations being offered to people of this
description, the escape is ever spoken of with a
|
FOOTNOTE
|
|
4
|
Grant of full protection
and commercial privileges to merchants of every nation or sect
as mentioned in the text above is not reconcilable with the
alleged plunder and ill-treatment of foreign traders passing
through the Panjab. The plunder of foreign traders by some lawless
marauders in a few rare cases in those unsettled days is not
improbable, but that could not be generalized. |
degree of joyful surprise, and a thanksgiving is offered to Providence
for the singular escape. This conduct, inimical to the progress of
civilization and an impediment to the influx of wealth, proceeds from
an extreme jealousy of strangers, added to a rapacity of temper, which
make them averse to the encouragement of any scheme in whose success
they do not immediately participate.
The Sieks are not rigorous in their stipulation with the Mohammedan
proselytes, who if they abstain from beef's flesh (which is held
in equal abhorrence by the Sieks as by the Hindus), and perform
the more ostensible duties, as burning their dead, and preserving
the hair of the head, an indulgent latitude is granted in all other
articles of the creed of Nanock.5
The Mohammedans who reside in the Panjab are subject to occasional
oppression, and often to the insults of the lower classes of the
people; amongst whom it is an uncommon practice to defile the places
of worship by throwing in the carcases of hogs and other things
held impure by the Mussulman law. The Mohammedans are also prohibited
from announcing their stated time of prayer, which conformably to
their usage, is proclaimed in a loud tone of voice. A Siek, who
in the chase shall have slain a wild hog, is frequently known to
compel the first Mohammedan to meet to carry to his home the body
of the animal; and, on being initiated into the rites of their religion,
the Sieks will sometimes require Mohammedan convert to bind on his
arm the tusk
of a bore,6 that by this act of
national impurity he may more avowedly testify a renunciation and
contempt of his former faith. The facts sufficiently mark the haughty
and insulting demeanour, which, with few deviations, forms a prominent
feature in the character of the military Sieks : but we may also
ascribe a certain portion of their severe and contumelious treatment
of Mohammedans to a remembrance of recent injuries.
The discordant interests which agitate the Siek nation, and the
constitutional genius of the people, must incapacitate them, during
the existence of these causes, from becoming a formidable defensive
power; nor are they invested with that species of executive strength
which is necessary to advance and establish a distant conquest.
In the defence and recovery of their country the Sieks displayed
a courage of the most obstinate kind, and manifested a perseverance,
under the pressure of calamities, which bear an ample testimony
of native resource, when the common danger had roused them to action,
and gave but one impulse to their spirit. Should any future cause
call forth the combined efforts of the Sieks to maintain the existence
of empire and religion, we may see some ambitious chief, led on
by his genius and success, and, absorbing the power of his associates
display from the ruins of their commonwealth the standard of monarchy.
The page of history is filled with the like effects. springing from
like causes. Under such a form of Government, I have little hesitation
in saying that the Sieks would be soon advanced to the first rank
amongst the native princes of Hindustan and would become a terror
of the surrounding states.7
|
FOOTNOTE
|
|
5
|
Rules of Sikh conduct,
called the rahit rahita in their terminology, are the same for
all Sikhs and are applicable to all converts whether from amongst
the Hindus or Mohammedans. |
|
6
|
The suppression or ill-treatment
of Muslims seems to have been very much exaggerated and may
be taken as based on wrongful information given to him by his
prejudiced informants. Colonel Polier himself also seems to
have been considerably influenced by the anti-Sikh propaganda
of the then interested parties. |
|
7
|
This prophecy of George
Forster came to be fulfilled in the person of Maharaja Ranjit
Singh (1780-1839) who created a monarchy, benevolent and republican
in its character, out of the various Sikh Misals and Muslim
States of the Panjab towards the end of the eighteenth century.
(Cf. George Forster. A Journey from Bengal to England, i.
295). |
|
 |