|
The Chief Khalsa Diwan was established on 30 October 1902, was the
main council of the Sikhs, controlling their religious and educational
affairs and raising its voice on behalf of their political rights.
It was proved to be a durable setup and it still retains its initiative
in education, though its role in the other spheres has progressively
shrunken over the years.
It was originally conceived as a central organization
of the Sikhs to replace Khalsa Diwan, Amritsar, and Khalsa Diwan,
Lahore, then torn by a conflict which was hampering the work of
Singh Sabhas affiliated to them.
A large public assembly held in the Malvai Bunga,
in the vicinity of the Golden Temple at Amritsar, on the Baisakhi
day of 1901, constituted a committee to draw up the constitution
of such a unitary body. The draft prepared was finally adopted on
21 Septem-
ber 1902.
The opening session of the new society, designated
Chief Khalsa Diwan, was held in the Malvai Buinga on the Divali
day, 30 October 1902, Babu Teja Singh, of Bhasaur, saying the inaugural
ardas or prayer. Bhai Arjan Singh, of Bagarian, was elected president,
Sundar Singh Majithia secretary and Sodhi Sujan Singh additional
secretary.
A total of twenty-nine Singh Sabhas including
those of Amritsar, Rawalpindi, Agra, Bhasaur, Badbar, Multan, Dakha
and Kairon affiliated themselves to the Diwan, the number rising
to 53 in a year's time.
Enrichment of the cultural, educational, spiritual
and intellectual life of the Sikhs, preaching the tenets of the
Guru Granth Sahib, propagating Sikh history, and protecting the
rights of the Sikhs by putting up memoranda and memorials to the
government were among its main concerns.
It especially aimed at opening schools and institutions
for the spread of education among men and women, publishing books
on Sikh history, sacred texts and doctrine, translating into Punjabi
works from other languages and opening institutions of community
welfare. Membership of the Diwan was open to all amritdhari Sikhs,
i.e. those who had received the rites of Khalsa initiation and who
could read and write Gurmukhi. Members were also expected to contribute
for the common needs of the community the obligatory dasvandh, or
one-tenth of their annual income. Any Singh Sabha or any other Sikh
society sharing its ideology could have itself affiliated to the
Diwan.
The Chief Khalsa Diwan theoretically incorporated
the perspectives and decisions of five major committees. A general
committee consisted of representatives from member institutions,
members delegated by the takhts and the Sikh princely states and
individuals who met fiscal and service criteria. That committee
elected an executive committee that met monthly and conducted most
of the regular business, referring critical matters to the broader
body. The other three committees
dealt with finances, advice (legal, administrative, religious) and
life-members. In general, the Chief Khalsa Diwan solicited public
input on issues and spent considerable time discussing letters and
differing opinions.
It frequently circulated documents to Singh
Sabhas or published them in journals for public comment. For example,
the Diwan sent out a questionnaire about opening the Guru Granth
Sahib in public meetings and decided on the basis of the replies
received (over 1,600) that the correct thing to do was, to open
the Guru Granth Sahib in a room connected to the assembly but not
in the public meeting hall.
To propagate the message of the Gurus, the Chief
Khalsa Diwan recruited a cadre of preachers. The Delhi darbar of
1903 when the Duke of Connaught was visiting India as a representative
of the British Crown was considered an appropriate occasion to initiate
the programme and several religious divans or congregations were
convened in the city by the Diwan to acquaint the people with the
beliefs and practices of the Sikhs.
An English translation of Guru Nanak's Japu
was distributed. Besides towns and cities in the Punjab, the Diwan
preachers made regular visits to adjacent provinces, notably NorthWest
Frontier Province and Sindh. To train ragis (musicians who recited
the sacred hymns), granthis (Scripture-readers) and preachers, the
Diwan opened in 1906 a Khalsa Pracharak Vidyalaya at Tarn Taran,
near Amritsar. In 1903, it launched its weekly newspaper, the Khalsa
Advocate.
Religious reform was one of the main objects
of the Chief Khalsa Diwan, and in pursuit of this aim it undertook
to codify the Sikh ritual and rules of conduct. To this end, a committee
was set up on 20 October 1910, consisting of Bhai Teja Singh, of
Bhasaur, Sant Gurbakhsh Singh, of Patiala, Bhai Vir Singh, Bhai
Jodh Singh, M.A., Bhai Takht Singh, Trilochan Singh, M.A., and the
Secretary of the Diwan. The draft the committee prepared was circulated
widely among the Sindh Sabhas and other Sikh societies as well as
among prominent individuals. The process was repeated twice, and
the code as finalized after prolonged deliberations was published
in March 1915 under the title Gurmat Prakash: Bhag Sanskar.
Historically, this was an important document,
standing midway between the traditional Rahitnamas and the Sikh
Rahit Maryada issued by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee
in 1950.
Linked with religious reform was the Chief Khalsa Diwan's programme
for the promotion of Punjabi language and literature. For this purpose
it established a Punjabi Pracharak sub-committee and assiduously
sought to have Punjabi, in Gurmukhi script, accepted in government
offices, especially in the postal and railways departments, for
certain preliminary work.
The Diwan, also opened libraries and Gurmukhi
schools as well as night classes for adults. It established in 1908
a Khalsa Handbill Society to prepare lithographed posters in Punjabi
for free distribution.
Advancement of Punjabi was one of the main planks
of the Sikh Educational Conference formed in 1908 at the instance
of the Diwan dignitaries such as Sundar Singh Majithia and Harbans
Singh Atari who, travelling through Sindh preaching Guru Nanak's
word, had attended in December 1907 a session of the Muhammadan
Educational Conference at Karachi and returned with the idea of
having a similar institution set up for Sikhs. Besides channelizing
the Diwan's work in behalf of Punjabi, the Sikh Educational Conference
did much to promote Western-style education among Sikhs. Its annual
sessions rotating from town to town were always occasions for considerable
public fervour.
They were largely attended and, besides discussion
of the problems of Sikh education, they comprised religious sessions
as well as competitions of Sikh kirtan and poetry. The Conference
still continues to be an active wing of the Chief Khalsa Diwan.
To ensure for Sikhs their due share in government
employment and in power then available to the Indian people, the
Chief Khalsa Diwan kept up pressure on the British authority through
representations and memoranda. In 1913, one of its leaders, Sundar
Singh Majithia, presented Sikh demands and claims before the Royal
Commission. Sundar Singh had been nominated a member of the Imperial
Council in 1909 replacing Tikka Ripudaman Singh, heir apparent of
Nabha state. There in the Council he piloted the Anand Marriage
Bill introduced by his predecessor in 1908. This was a major step
towards reforming Sikh ritual.
The Diwan put up on 31 March 1911 a memorandum
to the Viceroy, Lord Hardinge, then visiting the Punjab, seeking
just representation for the Sikhs in the services and in Imperial
and Provincial councils.
In 1916 and 1917 the Diwan's resolutions and
public demonstrations gradually moved from requests to demands.
A series of documents was sent to the government concerning Punjabi
language, jobs, and commissions in the army.
As secretary of the Chief Khalsa Diwan, Sundar
Singh Majithia sent a letter to the Punjab Government on 26 December
1916 reiterating the claims of the Sikh community for representation
in government jobs and legislative bodies, which should be "adequate
and effective and consistent with their position and importance."
On 18 September 1918, the Chief Khalsa Diwan called a representative
conclave of the Sikhs to consider the Montagu-Chelmsford scheme
of reform. In the memorandum prepared on behalf of the community,
government was urged to carry out the assurances given the Sikhs.
The publication of the Montagu-Chelmsford report was followed by
the appointment of Franchise Committee to go into the question of
the composition of the new legislatures in India. It had three Indian
members, but none of them was a Sikh.
When the Sikhs protested, Sundar Singh Majithia
was taken as a co-opted member for the Punjab, but their demand
for one-third of the total number of non-official seats held by
Indians in the Punjab, 7 out of 67 non-official seats in the Assembly
of India and 4 seats in the Council of States for the Sikh community
remained largely unfulfilled.
The political awakening among Indians in the
early years of the twentieth century gave rise to certain mass movements.
In the Punjab, the Chief Khalsa Diwan came to be looked upon as
moderate, pro-government and elitist over against the Shiromani
Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee and the Shiromani Akali Dal which
were more dynamic, anti-government and mass-based.
They soon wrested from the Diwan initiative
in religious and political spheres. The Shiromani Committee after
the adoption of the Gurdwaras Act 1925 took over management of all
the major historical Sikh shrines. The Shiromani Akali Dal has been
over the years the premier political party of the Sikhs. The Chief
Khalsa Diwan thus had its area of influence and activity severely
curtailed. It now restricts itself to expressing its opinion through
resolutions and memoranda on religious and political issues facing
the Sikh community.
In retrospect, the Chief Khalsa Diwan may be
seen to have made three key contributions to Sikh life. The first
was institutionalizing the Singh Sabha view of Sikhism as a separate
religion with distinct rituals and a tradition devoid of Hindu influence.
The resulting consciousness affected the way Sikhs looked at each
other and the world around them. Without that consciousness, the
mobilization of Sikhs spread across the world would have been impossible.
There would have been no drive for protecting Sikh rights nor assertion
of community control over the gurdwaras.
Secondly, the Diwan took existing but often
disparate Sikh organizations and linked them together in an effective
communication system. Efforts were focussed and information and
ideas disseminated over time and distance. This enhanced the sense
of Sikh identity and mission and opened up new paths of collaborative
action and also conflict. The religious gatherings, conferences,
district and provincial meetings, tracts and, most importantly,
the journals and newspapers all were critical legacies from the
Singh Sabha and Chief Khalsa Diwan era. Without them, there would
have been no dissemination of Sikh rituals, no sustained communication
and exchange of ideas, no network that could be activated for legislation
over anand marriage and no Akali challenge to the community.
The final element was a strategy for dealing
with internal division and survival as a minority community. Accommodation,
negotiation and compromise were hallmarks of the Diwan's policy.
Sikhs could not be totally self-reliant. Some of the Chief Khalsa
Diwan leaders, such as Sundar Singh Majithia, pursued collaborative
arrangements in the widened legislature and attempted to help Sikh
interests through alliances with other political groups and the
British. The Chief Khalsa Diwan, as an institution, however, resumed
its familiar task of trying to buttress Sikhism through education,
toleration and institution-building. The new representatives of
the Sikhs, the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee and the Akali
Dal, now had to face the problems of disunity, political alternatives
as a minority, and maintaining the contours of Sikh identity.
|
 |